Oops! Best before dates overrun a bit !

69er

Active member
Feedback
6 (100%)
Credits
1,748CR
This week I decided I don’t eat polo mints any more and moreso if it costs me up to £3 to win a pack ?? From this 9 cup allwin flick ball game… so I have adjusted the stack rails to accommodate a longer tube of refreshers.

In emptying the mints from the stack I noticed the first 6 packs were best before 14 July 2011,.. still it’s only sugar and zero moisture …. Still taste fine (well the top up ones 09April 2017 did! ) had to try one!

Maybe I should save them polo mints for when the refreshers run out ? Visitors probably wouldn’t notice the very small print? Would they? 😂😂😂 it’s ONLY 15 YEARS … would just be unlucky to win first flick ? …… Just for fun!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9471.jpeg
    IMG_9471.jpeg
    69.3 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_9472.jpeg
    IMG_9472.jpeg
    110.6 KB · Views: 30
Last edited:

bodgit

Newbie
Feedback
3 (100%)
Credits
82CR
Keep a pack back so that when someone says, "I swear Polo mints used to be bigger", you can whip the pack out as proof.

What I need is for someone to have a Wagon Wheel stashed away because as everyone knows, they used to be as big as a babies head.
 

Shipwreck Arcade

Active member
Credits
224CR
Keep a pack back so that when someone says, "I swear Polo mints used to be bigger", you can whip the pack out as proof.

What I need is for someone to have a Wagon Wheel stashed away because as everyone knows, they used to be as big as a babies head.
Exactly. Just like the recent Mars bar from 1991 found. It was compared to the ones we got now and is larger as we already know. Plus the taste and textures changed for the worse on some products..
 

69er

Active member
Feedback
6 (100%)
Credits
1,748CR
Keep a pack back so that when someone says, "I swear Polo mints used to be bigger", you can whip the pack out as proof.

As Shipwreck Arcade says “exactly that”
2011 packs are bigger than 2017 packs
In those six years buyers probably paid more for less polo mints ? See picture

27grams down to 24grams
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9473.jpeg
    IMG_9473.jpeg
    100.7 KB · Views: 17
Last edited:

Shipwreck Arcade

Active member
Credits
224CR
Definitely Roses and Quality Street changed for the worst. Used to be a real treat getting a large tin of each at Christmas. Now the wrappers, size, taste are all wrong. Tell me I'm wrong..
 

bodgit

Newbie
Feedback
3 (100%)
Credits
82CR
Yeah, I saw the Mars bar story as well. What I liked was that Mars was quoted in response as saying something like "We were just responding to consumer demand/opinion/criticism", like anyone has eaten a Mars bar and gone "these are really nice, I just wish they cost more and were considerably smaller"
 

Shipwreck Arcade

Active member
Credits
224CR
To be fair you can still buy 2kg tins, it's just no one does when they cost £20+ (which is pretty close to being in line with inflation).
Wasn't really so much the size of the tins i was on about, it was the contents. I definitely remember quality streets and roses tasting better, plus the wrappings on the chocolates used to be fun.
 

pubjoe

Active member
vacBacker
Feedback
7 (100%)
Credits
812CR
Yeah, they were definitely better. To be honest I didn't know about the availability of the big tins myself until a couple of years ago. Thought it was interesting as the supermarkets never have them. Might get on for this Christmas. As long as it has that smell when you open the lid. The tins always came in handy to store crap in after too.
 

bodgit

Newbie
Feedback
3 (100%)
Credits
82CR
Everything has palm oil now and barely any cocoa solids that it can still legitimately be called chocolate.

You could also just about get a pair of iffy 3D glasses with the red and green wrappers if you didn't mind a bit of branding.

I remember the thrill of thinking you'd found a stash of chocs only to find the tin was full of buttons or curtain hooks or sewing.
 
Top