Ah, my bad.
Looking back through the thread, I got mixed up with Kingtreelo mentioning the 9800x3d!
Sorry about that, I've been burning the candle at both ends recently with work and stuff.
So it's the fusion 80
https://www.very.co.uk/pcspecialist...p64gb-ramnbsp4tb-ssd-nbspblack/1601185649.prd
Looking at reviews, the motherboard should be more than capable of running your components.
Personally I have no issues with the build, I was under the impression it was the B850 Prime Plus.
https://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/1...d-with-lots-of-expansion-potential/index.html
Yeah, I'd just go along with what they suggest. The last thing they want is to have the system returned for something that can be resolved remotely. I'm sure they will be able to pinpoint the issue and sort it out.
Regarding performance, bandwidth with a 9850x3d 1:1 at 6000m/t CL30 looks to be roughly in the 80000 GB/s range, not sure of the exact figures as I've not tested one myself. You won't see much difference running slower speeds/latency, but higher bandwidth and lower latency help keep framerate dips/hitches and stutters at bay.
You could try running Aida64, even though it's the trial version you can still see what your Memory read and Memory latency figures are.
https://www.aida64.com/downloads
Here's a couple of my memory benches at different speeds that I did a while ago. I've managed to tighten up things a bit since I ran these and they are not really comparable to AMD, but it's something to look at. Intel sweetspot is latency under 50ns at 8000m/t CL 34 32gb A-die or 8200m/t - 8400m/t CL36 48gb M-Die, at that point going any faster is going well into the realm of diminishing returns. These benches were using 48gb M-Die sticks at 8200m/t - 8600m/t.
Some people run the benchmark in safe mode to get the best figures as not as many processes are running, but I just run the benchmarks in windows so my latency figures are not as low as they can be.
